Continuous Controls Monitor

FY2026 · AP + T&E · seven detectors · synthetic data
AP invoices
5,953
$8,426,439
T&E lines
21,546
$4,923,903
Findings
143
Flagged spend under review
$3,118,205
Precision
18%
26 seeded issues / 143 findings
False-positive rate
82%
the review cost of 100% recall
Recall vs seeded
100%
run --validate to verify

Findings by detector — ranked by flagged spend

"Flagged spend" is the dollar value of records a detector flagged for review — not an estimated loss. A Benford anomaly on $2.6M of vendor spend means $2.6M deserves a look, not that $2.6M is misstated; most flagged spend clears on review. No loss estimate is made anywhere on this page, deliberately — estimating losses before review is how monitoring reports get walked back.
benford violation high
2 findings · $2,577,802 flagged spend under review
split invoices critical
14 findings · $259,105 flagged spend under review
round dollar high
1 findings · $122,500 flagged spend under review
duplicate payment critical
15 findings · $77,028 flagged spend under review
weekend entry low
31 findings · $43,825 flagged spend under review
policy violation medium
77 findings · $37,946 flagged spend under review
expense velocity high
3 findings · $0 flagged spend under review

Review queue — top 25 by risk score

SevDetectorScore Flagged spendFinding
highround dollar100$122,500Pinnacle Consulting: 100% of 12 invoices are round-$500 multiples
mediumpolicy violation100$244E013: meal $319.09 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation100$239E370: meal $314.36 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation100$225E070: meal $299.86 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation100$221E282: meal $295.74 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation100$220E015: meal $295.48 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation100$219E214: meal $294.36 vs $75 per-diem
highexpense velocity100$0E077: 5 month(s) at 39 expenses vs median 4/mo, starting 2026-02
criticalsplit invoices98$32,006Summit Interiors/M03: 4 invoices totaling $32,006, each under the $10,000 approval threshold, within 10 days
mediumpolicy violation92$187E116: meal $262.14 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation90$180E330: meal $255.50 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation87$172E131: meal $246.97 vs $75 per-diem
criticalduplicate payment86$13,175Wilson Sonsini: $13,175.45 billed twice, 2d apart
criticalsplit invoices86$26,436Summit Interiors/M05: 3 invoices totaling $26,436, each under the $10,000 approval threshold, within 10 days
criticalsplit invoices86$26,042Summit Interiors/M07: 3 invoices totaling $26,042, each under the $10,000 approval threshold, within 10 days
criticalsplit invoices86$25,018Summit Interiors/M12: 3 invoices totaling $25,018, each under the $10,000 approval threshold, within 10 days
mediumpolicy violation86$167E089: meal $242.45 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation84$162E026: meal $237.42 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation83$159E303: meal $234.35 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation83$159E114: meal $234.19 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation83$159E084: meal $233.99 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation83$159E092: meal $233.66 vs $75 per-diem
mediumpolicy violation80$151E257: meal $225.90 vs $75 per-diem
criticalduplicate payment80$9,900Summit Interiors: $9,900.00 billed twice, 7d apart
mediumpolicy violation77$140E057: meal $214.77 vs $75 per-diem